Constructing
a Straggler from an Enumeration of N, {y € N | 1 ≤ y}
Theorem 1: Given an enumeration the set N,
{y ∊ N | 1 ≤ y} there exists a natural number Y
and Y
is a straggler.
Proof:
Theorem 1 is proved by running Program 2
to construct a number Y
that is
not part of the enumeration, which
contradicts the assumption that all elements of N,
{y ∊ N | 1 ≤ y} can be
enumerated with none missing. It is
necessary to show that Y will not be included in the
enumeration of N for y = 1 where 1 is the set {1}, y =
n where n is the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} and y = n
+ 1 where n + 1is the set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}. We can then
use mathematical induction to infer that Y will never appear in the
enumeration of N which will prove the theorem.
Constructing the number Y:
Case 1: y = {1}
Output of Program 2
y
|
Y
|
1
|
12
|
Y = 12
|
|
Case 2: y, {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}
Output of Program 2
y
|
Y
|
1
|
12
|
2
|
123
|
3
|
1234
|
4
|
12345
|
5
|
123456
|
6
|
1234567
|
Y = 1234567
|
|
Case 3: y, {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}
Output of Program 2
y
|
Y
|
1
|
12
|
2
|
123
|
3
|
1234
|
4
|
12345
|
5
|
123456
|
6
|
1234567
|
7
|
12345678
|
Y = 12345678
|
|
This proves the theorem for y = 1, y = n & y = (n + 1) and supports the conclusion that Y will never appear as part of the enumeration no matter how large the enumeration becomes. Thus, given an enumeration of elements from N, there is an element Y of N for which there is no corresponding y in the enumeration. That contradicts the assertion that all elements of N can be enumerated. The contradiction invalidates the assumption which proves the theorem, Y is a straggler.
No comments:
Post a Comment